Thursday, December 30, 2010

The Bert Blyleven Awards


In all likelihood, Bert Blyleven will be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame next week. This marks Blyleven's 14th year on the ballot, which places his year of retirement at 1992. I have never, not once in my life, watched Bert Blyleven pitch, but I sure have read a lot about the man. Blyleven was a workhorse who amassed piles of strikeouts, shutouts, and wins. His HOF candidacy over the years has taken a roller coaster ride. Detractors point to his merely decent winning percentage and lack of cultural impact, whereas his supporters make note of Byleven's sterling postseason record and legendary curveball.

What current pitcher is most similar to Bert Blyleven? The nominees:

Adam Wainwright

When you think of big curveballs nowadays, you think of Adam Wainwright. Over the last two years, Wainwright's curveball has been worth 45.7 runs according to FanGraphs, 20 runs better than the runner-up. Wainwright doesn't shy away from the pitch, throwing it a quarter of the time, the third-highest rate in the Majors. However, nobody can match the 40% rate Blyleven estimated that he threw in 1978. Blyleven was known for freezing batters with his curve, and Wainwright had at least one such famous moment. Both Wainwright and Blyleven threw their curveballs in unusual fashions. According to pitch grip expert Mike Fast, Wainwright's curve "is not quite a standard curveball grip in that his index finger is completely off the ball. Most pitchers lay it down alongside the middle finger on the ball." Blyleven, on the other hand, said that he "holds both his fastball and curveball across the seams." Blyleven recalled Sandy Koufax and Bob Feller pitching the same way, but at the time knew of no one else who did. I asked Mike Fast, and he is unaware of any current pitcher who exhibits this trait. Here's an image of a potential Blyleven curve.

Roy Oswalt

Like Blyleven, Oswalt has been a durable pitcher, averaging 200 innings per year in his career. According to Blyleven's manager Ray Miller, Blyleven was able to hold up year after year thanks to a smooth delivery with "a lot of leg drive," and Blyleven himself said "my durability as a pitcher comes from my legs more than my arm." 60ft6in's Sven Jenkins describes Roy Oswalt as "the ultimate 'drop and drive' pitcher.' He uses his legs to get the most out of his slight frame."

Blyleven's curve was the subject of Baseball Digest stories in 1978 and then again in 1989. Both times, he described two different variations of his curve. One, a "roundhouse curve" had a big, lazy break. The other, his "overhand drop" became his specialty. Several current pitchers throw multiple curves, including Bronson Arroyo, who can add and subtract from all of his pitches, and Chad Billingsley, who mixes in up to seven distinct pitch types. And Mike Mussina would have been a great Blyleven comp, given their durability, their propensity to throw breaking pitches, throw breaking pitches for strikes, and willingness to pitch to both sides of the plate. But Moose retired, so I'm not including him as a nominee. Instead, I think Roy Oswalt's array of curveballs aligns best with Blyleven's description. Oswalt has a standard overhand curve that clocks in the high 70s, but Oswalt has explained that he also throws a slower curveball by choking the ball deep into his hand. Jenkins notes that Oswalt can vary the velocity on his signature 12-to-6 curve from the upper 70s to down into the 60s. On the left side of this image, you can see the distinct clusters forming Oswalt's curveballs. You can also see that the ball's axis of rotation approaches zero degrees at times.

oswaltcurve.jpg


Justin Verlander

Verlander throws a monster breaking ball. He is generally around the plate with his curve, too. Verlander's curve baffles hitters, but more importantly, it fools umpires as well. In one famous incident, Blyleven got so fed up with an umpire's refusal to call his curveball for strikes that he began to throw batting-practice fastballs, afterward saying, "if he's not going to call my curveball for strikes, then I'm just going to throw my fastball down the middle." Verlander had a notable argument with an umpire this year for "not getting the strike call on back-to-back breaking balls around the inside corner."

Here is the called strike zone for Verlander's curve over the last two years.

Verlandercurve.jpg

I guess the only way you can tell whether the zone is fair or not is by counting the number of green points inside the strike zone box and the red points outside it. The method I used in determining that Verlander's curveball was the most umpire-unfriendly in baseball controlled for batter handedness, batter height, and pitch movement. It showed that Verlander has been screwed out of about 50 strikes, 20 more than anyone else. By comparison, here's the curveball strike zone for Javy Vazquez, to whom umpires have been more generous. Pay particular attention to the area down and away from RHBs.

A.J. Burnett

Ranking in terms of "stuff," Stephen Strasburg and a plethora of relievers boast the nastiest curveballs. But for starters with some degree of longevity, Burnett's is the hardest to hit. Burnett's curveball induces whiffs on 45% of swings, an obscene number. That's partially because he's so wild, throwing his curve in the zone under a third of the time. Blyleven and Burnett had similar philosophies about where to throw their curves, if not similar execution. Blyleven said that he "keeps the ball low and away to a righty," which appears to be Burnett's intention. Against lefties, Blyleven would try to "nick the outside corner" or "break it low and in." Again, this fits a visualization of Burnett's curve vs. LHBs. The problem is that where Blyleven threw strikes, Burnett throws wild pitches. Like Blyleven, Burnett is almost exclusively a two-pitch fastball/curveball pitcher, at times tinkering with a show-me change. Blyleven said that he threw his fastball in the low 90s and his curveball in the mid 80s. Burnett comes as close as it gets to fitting that profile.

Burnett also gets a nod for reportedly loosening up the Yankee clubhouse. His trademark is the cream pie, while Blyleven was a master at the hot foot.

Chris Carpenter

Carpenter, like Wainwright, throws a whole lot of curveballs, and he throws them well. Carp and Waino throw with similar velocity, movement, and release points. Few can spin the ball like these two. What sets Carpenter apart is that, like Blyleven, his fastball might be his better pitch. Wainwright's curveball has dominated baseball over the last two years, but Carpenter is the only pitcher in baseball with a fastball ranking in the top ten in terms of run value in addition to his top ten curveball. Blyleven said that, "my fastball was my best pitch, because it set up my curve. The control of your fastball is the key to success for any pitcher -- and not being afraid to pitch hard inside." Just last week, he said on the Jonah Keri Podcast, "my curveball was a very good pitch for me, but it's my fastball that set it up. Establishing the fastball on both sides of the plate set up my curveball." Carpenter pitches to both sides of the plate with his fastball. Pretty much anywhere so long as it's a strike. And when he is able to set up his curveball with a fastball, nobody has a chance. Carpenter's curve is on average 1.5 runs per 100 pitches above average, but when preceded by his fastball, it's 3.5 runs above average.

I submitted my ballot to Rich Lederer, who was given the final say on whom to elect for the Bert Blyleven Award:

-----

Jeremy sent an email a few days ago informing me that he wanted to "compare Blyleven to modern-day pitchers using PITCHf/x data for people like me, who never got to see Blyleven pitch." Here is my return email to Jeremy.

I believe Roy Oswalt, Adam Wainwright, Mike Mussina, Josh Beckett, and Chris Carpenter are good comps. Those would be my top five. All of these pitchers make sense if you think in terms of fastball velocity, wCB and wCB/C, WHIP, and K/BB.

Blyleven was a fastball/curveball pitcher. He threw an occasional changeup but it wasn't a significant part of his repertoire. His roundhouse was the so-called "slow curve" and the overhand drop the "12-to-6 hammer curve" that was his out pitch. With no public postings of radar-gun readings in those days to measure his fastball, my guess is that Blyleven threw a low-90s heater with the ability to dial it up to the mid-90s on occasion during the first half of his career. He definitely threw hard but his fastball more or less set up his curve. He could throw strikes with his fastball and curveball on both sides of the plate and at any point in the count.

Bert was also a workhorse. He threw more than 270 innings in eight different seasons. Of note, the 293.2 innings he pitched in 1985 has not been surpassed in the past 25 years. Leading the AL in home runs allowed in 1986 and 1987 had as much to do with ranking first and fourth, respectively, in innings pitched as it did with being around the plate a lot and hanging a few curveballs. However, for Blyleven's career, he was right at the MLB average for allowing homers (2.1% vs. 2.0%) and, in fact, gave up fewer HR/9 than a composite of his eight most similar HOF pitchers.

As it relates to his comps, Oswalt's fastball has averaged 93.1 mph during his career. Wainwright 90.6. Mussina 88.3 since 2002, probably more like 90ish in the earlier part of his career. Beckett 94. Carpenter 91.5 since 2002. The latter took much longer to develop and has missed more time to injuries than Blyleven. I think these are all good comps though. 90-94 mph fastballs with outstanding curveballs, excellent control and command, and somewhat similar K and BB rates.

I didn't realize I had final say on the Bert Blyleven Award (singular) until Jeremy returned with his nominations. The truth of the matter is that I believe a composite of Oswalt and Wainwright would be one heck of a match. A righthanded starting pitcher with a 92 mph fastball and a hellacious curveball with outstanding control and the ability to miss bats.

The winner? Roy Wainwright. Or is it Adam Oswalt? OK, make it Roy Oswright. Or even Adam Wainwalt. Yeah, it's one of those guys.

For what it's worth, here is a statistical comparison between Blyleven's career through his 32-year-old season and Oswalt:

Blyleven-Oswalt.png

Similarly, here is a statistical comparison between Blyleven's career through his 28-year-old season and Wainwright:

Blyleven-Wainwright.png

-----

This marks my final piece as a regular contributor to Baseball Analysts. I'm no longer a student, which means that I now have to make my way out in the real world--the one with all the hard knocks. I'm much obliged to Rich for giving me a writing platform and always providing thoughtful comments on my work. Thanks to my fellow authors at Baseball Analysts for giving it 100% and no more because they knew doing so would be mathematically impossible. And thanks to the readers, especially to those who were generous enough to offer criticism. Catchphrase.

 
 

Nebraska And Tennessee Among Those In Action Today


Tennessee quarterback Theo Scott, left, is tackled by Tennessee's Gerald Williams during the first half of an NCAA college football game Saturday, Sept. 26, 2009, in Knoxville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Wade Payne)

Wade Payne - AP

over 1 year ago: Tennessee quarterback Theo Scott, left, is tackled by Tennessee's Gerald Williams during the first half of an NCAA college football game Saturday, Sept. 26, 2009, in Knoxville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Wade Payne)

View full size photo »

Look for Tennessee and Nebraska to come out on top in their bowl games later today.

The Bowl season continues with three more games for Thursday.  In early action, Syracuse is taking on Kansas State at Yankee Stadium in the Pinstripe Bowl.  If that doesn't get you excited - me neither - there are a couple of games later this evening that should keep you entertained.

First off, Tennessee plays what is essentially a home game against North Carolina in the Music City Bowl in Nashville.  For the Tar Heels it is a last chance to salvage what was supposed to be a strong season.  That all changed after the 'Heels started 0-2, then were buried behind a slew of NCAA sanctions for player involvement with agents.  

 

The NCAA's evaluation dragged well into the second month of the season and weighed heavily on the Tar Heels, who eventually saw the dismissal of senior defensive tackle and All-American candidate Marvin Austin and were handed permanent ineligibility rulings on top returning wideout senior Greg Little as well as first-team preseason All-American defensive end Robert Quinn and senior starting cornerback Charles Brown. UNC persevered under head coach Butch Davis to gain a bowl bid for the third straight year, managing to climb to 6-3 after a 37-35 win over then No. 24 Florida State on November 6th before dropping two of its last three to end at 7-5 and 4-4 in the ACC.

The Tar Heels are 12-16 all-time in bowl games with losses in each of their last three postseason appearances. UNC took part in the Meineke Car Care Bowl the last two years and suffered successive losses to West Virginia and Pittsburgh, in that order. The program's last bowl win came in 2001 -- a 16-10 triumph over Auburn in the Peach Bowl.

"I congratulate our team, and especially the 17 seniors, for the extraordinary job they've done in leading our program to a third consecutive bowl appearance," said Davis. "Regardless of the situation, this team fought week after week to make our fans proud. We look forward to representing North Carolina against a talented Tennessee team."

Tennessee came on strong to win its last four games and become bowl eligible at 6-6 with a 3-5 ledger in SEC play. The season was Derek Dooley's first as head coach after Lane Kiffin up and bolted after one year at the helm for the open position as head man at Southern California. Dooley has the historic UT program back in the postseason for a second consecutive year coming off a 37-14 loss to Virginia Tech under Kiffin in the 2009 Chick-fil-A Bowl.

Tennessee is 25-23 all-time in postseason play and making its 49th bowl appearance, which is tied for second in NCAA history alongside Texas. The Vols have alternated wins and losses in their last five trips to the postseason. Their last victory was a New Year's Day triumph in 2008 against Wisconsin in the Outback Bowl.

This will be the first meeting between the two programs since 1961 when UNC logged a 22-21 win. The Volunteers lead the overall series, 20-10-1. The two sides have never met in a bowl game or previously participated in the Music City Bowl, which is in its 13th year of existence.

Later tonight, the (17)Nebraska Cornhuskers take on the Washington Huskies in the Holiday Bowl in San Diego.  The Huskies played the 'Huskers earlier this season with Nebraska coming out with a 56-21 win at UW.

 

The Cornhuskers rode a 6-2 conference record to a second straight Big 12 North title, but blew a 17-0 lead en route to a 23-20 loss to Oklahoma in the Big 12 title game on Dec. 4th. They finished the regular season with a 10-3 overall record.

This will be Nebraska's second consecutive appearance in the Holiday Bowl, after a 33-0 trouncing of Arizona in 2009's edition. The Cornhuskers currently hold a 24-22 all-time bowl game record, with this being their 47th bowl game appearance

Washington enters the Holiday Bowl in the midst of a three-game win streak. The Huskies defeated UCLA, Cal and Washington State to salvage a deteriorating regular season and secure their first bowl appearance since the 2002 Sun Bowl. They closed the 2010 campaign 6-6 overall and tied for third in the Pac-10 with USC, at 5-4.

Thursday's game against Nebraska will mark Washington's fourth appearance in the Holiday Bowl, were the Huskies previously faced Big 12 opponents Colorado, Kansas State and Texas. This will be Washington's 31st bowl game appearance, dating back to 1924. The team posts a 15-14-1 all-time record in such games.

 
 

Tressel: Suspended Buckeyes To Return In 2011


The Ohio State Buckeyes have arrived in New Orleans for the Sugar Bowl but few people wanted to talk about the game.  The main topic of conversation is 'tattoo-gate', involving five Buckeyes players including star quarterback Terrelle Pryor.  The five players have already been suspended for the first five games of 2011 but many feel the NCAA did the Buckeyes a favor by allowing Pryor and others to play in the Sugar Bowl.  Ohio State head coach Jim Tressel addressed those concerns today:

"We told them they would have to make the decision on the NFL prior to leaving for the bowl game," Tressel said at his first Sugar Bowl news conference. "It wouldn't be fair to not face the consequences down the road."

The implication is that all five stated their intention to return to Ohio State for their senior seasons instead of playing Tuesday night and heading for the NFL.  In all honesty that could still happen anyway.  Nothing can keep Pryor, or any of the players - tailback Dan Herron, offensive tackle Mike Adams, receiver DeVier Posey and defensive end Solomon Thomas - from heading to the NFL this spring anyway.

 
 

You Tell Us the Motorsports Story of 2010




Thanks to history-making performances and an abundance of audacious racing, motor racing provided the entire sports world with some of the most compelling stories of the year.

Perhaps we should have seen it coming. The surreal pothole misadventure in the season-opening Daytona 500 may have been a sign this would be a year like no other.

Whether a highlight reel of great efforts or one of great feuds grabbed your attention, FanHouse wants you, the fans, to pick the motorsports story of the year, and I have spotlighted a few of the plenty to chose from.

Jimmie Johnson's unprecedented fifth consecutive NASCAR Sprint Cup Series title is Hall of Fame worthy and will likely never be equaled, nor will 60-year-old drag racing icon John Force's amazing 15th championship run in NHRA Funny Car drag racing, coming as it did three years after a death-defying crash.

Chip Ganassi became the first team owner in history to win the Daytona 500 and Indianapolis 500 in the same year and threw in victories in NASCAR's Brickyard 400 Indianapolis race, the IZOD IndyCar Series championship and the Grand-Am sports car title for good measure. NASCAR's favorite bad boy Kyle Busch good-naturedly endured the boos and jeers en route to victory circle after victory circle, racking up a record 24 wins in three national divisions.

Team Penske driver Will Power returned from a broken back in 2009 with a series-best five wins and eight poles in the IZOD IndyCar Series, only to have rival Dario Franchitti dramatically grab the championship in the final race -- the second straight year Franchitti trailed entering the last race and took the trophy home.
 
 

Lightning Lap 2011 – Feature


Lightning Lap 2011 - Feature

For the fifth time, we shake down the year's hottest metal at VIR.

In an ideal world, we'd love to drive these cars on a public road, but running machines such as these at their limit on the highway pre­sents practical problems—things like other drivers, speed limits, and roadside hazards.

 
 

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

It's Steelers week, and I've got a feeling


Browns coming off a disappointing 20-10 loss to the Ravens this past Sunday in Cleveland. It was supposed to be Colt McCoy's statement game against a tough divisional opponent. Ed Reed did what Ed Reed always does. It's like you almost knew he was going his two interceptions and be on his merry way with a victory.

Colt McCoy struggled. And it was his first true nightmare game of his career. People including myself shouldn't have thought that he was going to roll on forever without any trouble or without this game. This game comes for everybody. All the great ones. The Montanas. The Marinos. The Kosars. They all had poor games when they were young Quarterbacks against physical and experienced defenses. I really don't think McCoy's lack of arm strength was a huge factor in the poor game. I think his arm is strong enough in the intermediate passing game that it can cut through the winds on days like this past Sunday in the future. I think it's good that he's getting this game time logged and this experience. He's going to be a good one.

Even though Toni Grossi sucks, he reminds us that it's Steelers week. And I have a weird feeling that the Browns pull one off this Sunday. And it will be Eric Mangini's swan song. But I just have this feeling that McCoy learns from this past Sunday in a big way and ends the season on a solid note.
 
 

Grading The Positions From The Ravens vs. Browns Game


CLEVELAND - DECEMBER 26:  Cornerback Lardarius Webb #21 of the Baltimore Ravens recovers a fumble as Ray Lewis #52 Dawan Landry #26 and lineman Joe Thomas #73 of the Cleveland Browns look on at Cleveland Browns Stadium on December 26 2010 in Cleveland Ohio.  (Photo by Matt Sullivan/Getty Images)

Matt Sullivan - Getty Images

3 days ago: CLEVELAND - DECEMBER 26: Cornerback Lardarius Webb #21 of the Baltimore Ravens recovers a fumble as Ray Lewis #52 Dawan Landry #26 and lineman Joe Thomas #73 of the Cleveland Browns look on at Cleveland Browns Stadium on December 26 2010 in Cleveland Ohio. (Photo by Matt Sullivan/Getty Images)

View full size photo »

The end of the season for the Cleveland Browns hasn't exactly gone as planned, especially after their most recent loss to the Baltimore Ravens. Nonetheless, it's still time to grade the positions once again with a "Pass" or "Fail."

The end of the season for the Cleveland Browns hasn't exactly gone as planned, especially after their most recent loss to the Baltimore Ravens. Nonetheless, it's still time to grade the positions once again with a "Pass" or "Fail."

OFFENSE

  • QB (FAIL): Colt McCoy had some accurate short passes early on to move the football, but his three interceptions hurt several scoring opportunities. McCoy also began struggling on his short passes in the second half, arguably having his worse game of the season.
     
  • RB (FAIL): An early shot to his back by Ed Reed prevented Peyton Hillis from playing at full strength. Hillis didn't have anywhere near the type of game he did against Baltimore the first time around. In limited action, Mike Bell had his best game of the season.
     
  • WR (FAIL): After Mohamed Massaquoi's trick-play touchdown to Brian Robiskie, things went down for the wide receivers, particularly Massaquoi. He was involved in all three interceptions, plays where it seemed like he could have fought more to break up the passes. He also had a costly fumble that I deem as the turning point of the game.
     
  • TE (PASS): The Browns were thin at tight end heading into the game, and for the limited number of receptions he had, Watson made the most of his catches to try to rally the offense late in the game.
     
  • OL (PASS): While the Ravens were able to limit Hillis, it seemed like the offensive line did a good job selling some cutback opportunities for the big back early in the game. McCoy was protected fairly well too.

DEFENSE

  • DL (FAIL): Travis Ivey got the start at defensive end over Brian Schaefering, but overall the defensive line did not have much of an impact. Ray Rice had good enough holes to run through to move the chains, and it seemed like Shaun Rogers' reps were limited.
     
  • LB (FAIL): David Bowens had a nice breakup of an early wide receiver screen pass, but the linebackers failed to generate a pass rush from Marcus Benard and Matt Roth.
     
  • DB (PASS): Joe Haden had another brilliant game, finishing with an interception, a sack, and a forced fumble. He also blanketed Anquan Boldin very well throughout the entire game. Sheldon Brown was victimized by Derrick Mason during the game, but it wasn't like Brown's coverage was terrible -- Joe Flacco just made a couple of nice throws for some big plays.

SPECIAL TEAMS

  • ST (PASS): Joshua Cribbs seemed to move a little bit better than he has the past couple of weeks. Reggie Hodges' punts were short, but that was due to the Browns punting near mid-field.
 
 

Cavaliers Look To Stop Road Woes Tonight In Charlotte


93176_suns_bobcats_basketball

Chuck Burton - AP

Charlotte Bobcats' Stephen Jackson (1) celebrates with teammate Charlotte Bobcats' Boris Diaw (32), of France, in the second half of their 123-105 win over the Phoenix Suns in an NBA basketball game in Charlotte, N.C., Saturday, Nov. 20, 2010. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)

View full size photo »

Cleveland has lost 12-straight road games heading into tonight's action, and the Bobcats took 3-of-4 from the Cavaliers a season ago.

 

The Cleveland Cavaliers hope to solve their road woes when they try to stop a 12-game losing streak as the guest tonight against the Charlotte Bobcats at Time Warner Cable Arena.

The Cavs are 3-13 as the visitor this season and lost their fourth straight overall with Tuesday's 110-95 setback versus the Orlando Magic at Quicken Loans Arena. Antawn Jamison finished with 21 points and Daniel Gibson had 15 points and six boards for Cleveland, which has just one win in its last 15 contests overall and was outscored, 35-21, in the fourth quarter.

"Thirty-six good minutes of basketball. That's basically what we played. We didn't play very well in the fourth quarter," Cavs head coach Byron Scott said.

Mo Williams and Anderson Varejao both had 14 points in defeat.

Cleveland will also make a stop in Chicago on the quick trek.

Charlotte, meanwhile, began the Paul Silas era on a positive note with Monday's 105-100 triumph over the Detroit Pistons at home.

D.J. Augustin scored 27 points and Stephen Jackson added 23 for the Bobcats, who snapped a four-game slide and won for only the second time in its last eight overall.

The 67-year-old Silas took over for Larry Brown, who resigned from his post on Wednesday after the Bobcats got off to a 9-19 start this season. Silas returned to the NBA coaching ranks for the first time since he was fired by the Cleveland Cavaliers near the end of the 2004-05 season.

"It was great," Silas said about returning to coaching. "It brought back old memories; it just comes back to you. You just want to win. You tell the players what they're doing, and I've got great assistant coaches that are helping me. It's going to take some time but I liked the effort tonight. If we continue to play with this kind of effort then it's unbelievable what we can do."

In injury news for the Bobcats, Tyrus Thomas, who had 14 points off the bench in the win, is probable for tonight with a sore right wrist. Forward Gerald Wallace (ankle) is listed as questionable and has missed five straight games.

The Bobcats will also host Golden State and Miami on their current five-game residency is 7-7 at home this season. They won three of four matchups with Cleveland last year, but the Cavs are 16-6 in the previous 22 contests in this series.

 
 

Chief/Joe Greene awards coming today


The Chief Award, given to the Steelers player who best represents former owner Art Rooney's cooperation with the media will be handed out today. It's voted on by the local members of the Pro Football Writers of America, of which I am one.

The winner of this year's award will be something of a surprise.

The Joe Greene rookie of the year award was something of a no-brainer, even though the Steelers have a number of good candidates. It wasn't that long ago that we gave it to Patrick Bailey for his special teams contributions.
 
 

Dakar Rally opens diverse 2011 Robby Gordon schedule that includes Daytona 500


CHARLOTTE – Robby Gordon roams around his shop about three weeks before his 2011 season kicks off with the Dakar Rally, and he has a group of mechanics working on his Hummer for that event and a smaller group working on a Sprint Cup car for the Daytona 500. The three Dakar support haulers, with millions of dollars worth of equipment, were ready a month earlier and left by boat for South America. The actual race vehicles needed to be finished in a week so they could be put on a hauler to Miami and then shipped as air freight to Argentina.
 
 

Williams-Cosworth ‘aim for top four in 2011′ | Interview


Mark Gallagher, Cosworth, 2010

Mark Gallagher, Cosworth, 2010

Cosworth are ready to shake off their image as F1′s "underdog" engine manufacturer and win races again.

F1 business manager Mark Gallagher told F1 Fanatic: "Cosworth would win Grands Prix if it was in the back of a car that's capable of winning".

And he said the engine manufacturer were aiming for a top-four finish in the 2011 constructors' championship with Williams. Read on for the first part of the interview.

F1 Fanatic: Would you agree it was a successful return to F1 for Cosworth in 2010 after three years away?

Mark Gallagher: It was a successful year for us. We had a number of operational objectives for this year which we've achieved. It was a very demanding reintroduction into Formula 1 as an engine supplier.

We hadn't been away from F1 as a company because in Cosworth Electronics we'd continued to supply wind tunnel monitoring systems and of course vehicle electronics to teams in F1 all the way through the 2007-9 seasons.

But we had been out of engine supply. Coming back in, first of all we were going to come in supporting only the new teams under a different set of technical rules proposed as part of the cost-capping proposals the FIA had been working on in the early part of 2009.

Obviously that changed, after we had already signed up to supplying the teams, so we had to re-configure the engine to work to an entirely different set of rules. Namely, that the engine would have to have a much longer life; that it couldn't produce peak power at 20,000 rpm it would have to do so at 18,000, or just under; and that fuel consumption was now critical because there was no refuelling.

We have a very strong engineering team under our technical director Bruce Wood. We have a guy who runs engine design, James Allen, and we have engine development under a guy called Dave Gudd and that triumvirate headed up the huge amount of work that needed to be done.

So I think the reintroduction of Cosworth as an engine supplier has gone well. We didn't suffer a single failure in a race this year. In pre-season testing we expected we would have to do further work to optimise the engine because it had never run in a car. And so many of our new customers didn't test – HRT did no testing, Virgin did limited testing, Lotus did some testing and pretty much all of it was in wet weather.

Only Williams did all of the testing and they were busy getting their car up to speed. It was only at the beginning of the season we began to learn where we were and optimise our performance.

But we made big strides and we look back on the year with a lot of satisfaction. It's certainly been a very good foundation for us to build on in the next few years.

Cosworth CA2010 engine

Cosworth CA2010 engine

F1F: What did the process of optimising and developing involve, given how tight the rules are?

MG: Obviously development is a closed area. But what you can do is work with the teams on, for example, the 'aardvark' – the air intake configuration you use to get air into the airbox. The airbox itself is a homologated item.

You can also play with exhaust systems and calibrate an engine to, for example, use a blown diffuser which we did with Williams very successfully.

The calibration of the engine – how it performs from circuit to circuit, how it responds to power demand from the driver, is an important area.

Again, with Williams we learned a lot because of the experience of Rubens Barrichello and that, allied to their resources and high expectations, meant that we learned a lot working with them. Obviously the new teams were on a very steep learning curve.

The only thing you can do in terms of optimising performance is if you spot a potential reliability problem, you can fix it – that's allowed. If you see something that is going to compromise you, cost the teams a lot of money, or ultimately cause a failure, you can apply to the FIA. And it could be something as simple as a washer that isn't doing the job that's intended.

There's a slight opportunity to exploit or explore the limits of what you're permitted to do. The FIA keep a very tight rein on it. All the manufacturers can be sent the request that you have sent to the FIA so Ferrari, Renault and Mercedes will be sent a request from Cosworth and we will be sent a request from any of them. So it's very tightly policed.

I think it's actually one of the great successes of Formula 1 in recent years that gets overlooked. There's a lot of talk about concerns over engine parity. The reality is the world championship is fought between three different engine suppliers: Red Bull-Renault, McLaren-Mercedes and Ferrari. Three competitors in the battle and towards the end of the season we were qualifying Rubens sixth, seventh, eighth – Cosworth were there, we were in the top ten, getting into Q3.

In my view the regulations have worked terribly well. There's not a lot to choose between the engines. While others have said "Oh, we don't have the same power as the others, we should be allowed to re-tune", though you may have less power, if you also have less fuel consumption, good drive-ability, good weight and an optimised package and – in Renault's case – you go and win the world championships, then to be honest I think the situation as it stands is very acceptable.

F1F: Based on those measures you've described – performance, fuel consumption and so on – what do you think your engine's strengths are?

MG: We have good power – obviously I'm not going to put a figure on it but we're satisfied with where we are in the power stakes – we have good fuel economy and good fuel-saving modes, and we have extremely good reliability.

At the beginning of the year we were not satisfied with power degradation – the loss of power over time as the engine ages.

We also had a potential reliability problem and we had to nip that in the bud. A lot of work was done around the first four races to resolve what was a potentially serious issue for us. I'm pleased to say we reacted quickly, it didn't compromise our teams, and that was good.

I would say that the issues we would have probably, on balance, had more discussion about internally were to do with initial drive-ability when the engine came out. We had to work on the mapping – obviously we can't change the mechanical structure of the engine, it is as it is.

Drive-ability was one thing that Rubens, Jarno [Trulli] and Timo [Glock] – the more experienced drivers – gave us feedback on. We had to work on that with our teams.

Basically, our engine performs in a certain way so we have to work closely with the teams in order to know what gears they're running, how the car's performing, and optimise that.

It's almost an unending task of trying to get the best out of it. You never hear a driver or a team say the engine's perfect. Actually, you'll never hear us say an engine's perfect – there's no such thing. Internal combustion engines are not that efficient so there's always a bit more to come.

Can you produce more power? Of course you can. Does it use more fuel? Yes. Everybody wants more power with less fuel being used. It's a constant battle.

But there's good satisfaction here about where we're at. I think there were a number of battles this year which were quite interesting in terms of our engine performance and power: Nico Rosberg got stuck behind Nico Hülkenberg in Barcelona and it was very evident that the Mercedes-Benz couldn't get past the Williams-Cosworth on the straights.

Here at Cosworth we really picked up on that, there were some radio conversations between Rosberg and his engineer who was telling him: "You won't get past him on the straights". Given that the Mercedes-Benz is a pretty good engine it was nice for us to have that measure early on in the year.

The pole position in Brazil was very satisfying but it was down to the conditions. Nico obviously got heat into the tyres at the right time, it was a great strategy decision by Williams and it gave us a lift but no-one here and no-one at Williams believed it was anything other than a point in time where, in those conditions, that driver with tyres at the right temperature was able to get a lot more performance. It was really down to the strategy Williams employed and Nico's very strong driving.

Rubens Barrichello, Williams, Bahrain, 2010

Rubens Barrichello, Williams, Bahrain, 2010

F1F: You described the benefits of working with an experienced partner in the shape of Williams and Barrichello, was that something you began looking for after you signed up with the three new teams?

MG: It evolved, really. When I came to Cosworth in August 2009 the contract as that we had were with USF1, Campos and Virgin. A month later, in September, Lotus received their entry and suddenly we found ourselves with four teams.

Then in November Williams came along. Obviously things had changed with Toyota who were pulling out of Formula 1. They were looking at their options and could have gone in a number of different directions.

Sam Michael said at our staff event last week that Williams felt they had "unfinished business" with Cosworth. They knew that the 2006 engine had been a good one and although they hadn't had the results that year that they wanted they realised that it was a combination of factors and not down to Cosworth doing a bad job with the engine.

Williams came back to the table saying "look, we feel we've got unfinished business, how about working together" And, obviously, from a Cosworth point of view, the opportunity to run with a benchmark team that wants to win again was very attractive. So we signed up with them.

So for a short period of time, from November until February, we were actually signed up with five teams. Then USF1 raised a white flag and we ended up with four. That was still more than the three we'd planned for.

Working with Williams was a great opportunity. They're a terrifically competitive bunch of people. I'm lucky that I know Sam Michael, we worked together at Jordan in the late nineties. And Adam Parr, Patrick Head and Frank Williams have great determination to get back up to the front.

We've learned a lot from that and while finishing sixth in the constructors' championship is not satisfactory for Williams-Cosworth, at least it is the top half of the championship, and our sights for next season are to be challenging for the top four again.

F1F: There was a clear upward trajectory through the season, the car was getting better, obviously they took sixth off Force India very late in the day.

MG: I think at the beginning of the year the overall package had been compromised: the package had changed from Toyota to Cosworth and there was very little pre-season testing. Rubens had just arrived and I think in the early races if you look back Williams-Cosworth was in among Sauber and Toro Rosso.

By Valencia we had made great strides and the package was getting quicker race by race. If you look at how close we were to the pole position time it came down and down.

In the races the performance was not quite where we wanted it to be. From Cosworth's point of view the bit that we can influence is our engine. We have done and will continue to do everything that we can to optimise that and make sure the engine is installed in the chassis as efficiently as possible, answer questions from Sam ad the technical team and hopefully the Williams-Cosworth FW33 will be another step forward.

F1F: How do you see the package now compared to how it was at the start of testing?

MG: I think the package had gone from having some issues to having a lot of those addressed and really beginning to show a sufficient turn of speed to take on and beat Force India.

They have a good package, particularly the McLaren-Mercedes back end on the car, and Adrian Sutil is no slouch.

We've made headway and Williams have made headway and it's fair to say that if you spend any time with the Williams team you see that's there's an enormous determination to get back up there. Frank and Patrick are pretty amazing characters to be around and obviously it's been a while since they've won and they want to win again and obviously we want to win.

If we don't win, we know that over time the impression will continue that Cosworth is somehow uncompetitive and the reality is that we're not uncompetitive. We don't have an uncompetitive product, we just need to have it in a car that performance as an overall package. Our contribution to that needs to be as good as possible.

Michael Schumacher, Benetton, TI Aida, 1994

Michael Schumacher, Benetton, TI Aida, 1994

F1F: In Cosworth's recent history in Formula 1, since the sixties and seventies, you have often been seen as the under-rated underdog that occasionally pulls off surprise performances.

MG: Yeah, I think a lot of people are still surprised to recall that Michael Schumacher won his first world championship with a Ford-Cosworth engine at Benetton. I think Ford probably managed to underwhelmingly promote that. Everybody seems to think that Michael won two world championships with Benetton-Renault!

If I look back to my first season at Jordan in 1991, we came in and finished fifth in the world championship out of 17 teams at its first attempt. Using Cosworth customer engines we very nearly won the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa with Andrea de Cesaris.

Cosworth has been producing competitive engines for a long time. If you look at Ayrton Senna's season with the Cosworth engine in the McLaren, everyone remembers his win at Donington, which was with one of our engines.

You don't have to go back that far to see Cosworth producing competitive engines and from what I've seen in my 16 months here, we still produce competitive engines. The difficulty is, our engines are not often in the back of competitive cars.

The fact is that, at the turn of the last decade, the world of Formula 1 fell in love with car manufacturers who would write very large cheques and sponsor teams. That left no room for Cosworth, Cosworth was owned by Ford who, having invested in Stewart and morphed that into Jaguar, didn't have a team in Milton Keynes who were producing a car that was capable of winning Grands Prix.

The Ford-Cosworth element of its involvement in Formula 1 was compromised and if you look at what Adrian Newey and Christian Horner have achieved at that team since Red Bull took it over it just goes to show that with better management, better technical direction, better investment in the areas that matter, that team turned around.

So, if you want a blunt statement, Cosworth would win Grands Prix if it was in the back of a car that's capable of winning, and I'm confident about that.

Is that a criticism of the teams we're working with? Absolutely not. It's just a recognition that the overall package has to deliver. I'm not arrogant about it, we know that our engine can always be optimised, but I think Cosworth's image in the last 20 years, as you said, often has been seen as the underdog manufacturer.

I think that's unfair. When I read some of the postings on the internet of what fans have to say it's irritating because people just aren't looking at the fact. There are some media who just don't actually come and find out the facts. I can take a journalist to our dyno and show them the power our engine is producing and be absolutely confident that what we're doing as a company is a good job.

But Formula 1 is a very competitive arena and you need to have the whole package delivering. But in a season where I think Ferrari lost six engines and we've lost none, we're pretty sure we're doing a good job.

F1F: Obviously you're losing one team next year with Lotus moving to Renault power. Does that create a vacancy for you to ally with a team that's closer to the front?

MG: Not in 2011 and 2012, for the balance of the current engines. I don't think anyone will change engines going into the last season with the V8s.

We always planned that this return to Formula 1 as an engine supplier would involve three teams. That's what the optimum plan was.

Having three teams for next year and 2012 is where we expected to be at. I always took the view that 2010 was slightly an anomaly because we were supplying a third of the grid.

And again, I think the fact we were supplying so many – none of the car manufacturers were – gave us a massive job to do. If we'd got it wrong, and there'd been pistons and cranks all over the track at the start of the season, it would have affected a third of the grid, not one or two teams, so we had a huge obligation not only to our teams but also to Formula 1 to get it right. From that point of view we did a good job.

For 2011 and 2012 with Williams, Virgin and HRT our intention is to get as much as we can out of the product and give those teams the best support we can.

 
 

Jim Rice, Chet Lemon, and How I Think About Wins Above Replacement


Inspired by Mike Axisa's new Twitter feed, @WARGraphs, I have been playing around with a new tool, or at least one that's new to me. As you may know, WAR Graphs is a Fangraphs feature where you can compare up to four players by Wins Above Replacement. Once one enters their desired search, three graphs appear. One shows how the players compare in their nth best seasons. The second shows how they compare year-by-year over the course of their careers. The final one shows how they stack up by age.

It's a neat tool, and a handy one when like-minded folks are looking to settle a quick dispute. For instance, as a Red Sox fan, a pet issue of mine has been the travesty that is Jim Rice's Hall of Fame enshrinement while Dwight Evans never amassed more than eight percent of the vote. Anyway, here are two of the three WAR Graphs for a Rice and Evans comparison.

Dewey%20%26%20Rice%201.png

Dewey%20%26%20Rice%202.png

Because the topic is something of an obsession for me, I tweeted my findings from this WAR Graphs search last night.

Jim Rice & Dewey were similar, if you ignore Dewey's 35-40 seasons when he hit .283/.387/.470 (133 OPS+) http://is.gd/jFVpAless than a minute ago via TweetDeckPatrick Sullivan
PatrickSull

When he saw this, Dave Cameron responded with the following:

@PatrickSull My favorite - run Jim Rice against Chet Lemon; pick up jaw.less than a minute ago via TweetDeckDavid Cameron
d_a_cameron

And sure enough, here is the WAR Graphs comparison of Rice and Chet Lemon.

Rice%20%26%20Lemon%201.png

Rice%20%26%20Lemon%202.png

Chet Lemon and Jim Rice are more or less indistinguishable. Chet. Lemon.

**********

All of this was a long and graphical way of setting up the point of this post, which is to articulate a coherent way to think about WAR in the context of Hall of Fame voting. Jonah Keri has done a really nice job advocating for Tim Raines in a more visceral way than Rich Lederer has for Bert Blyleven. Rich has gradually won over voters by reminding them time and again of Blyleven's statistical dominance. Keri, on the other hand, will make his case with stats, but also with well-supported assertions along the lines of had Rickey Henderson never come along, Raines may well be regarded as the finest lead-off man ever. That resonates more than a WAR Graph with many.

To take it a step further, not only is something like WAR altogether unpersuasive to some, but when many see the WAR Graph above of Jim Rice and Chet Lemon, their gut may be to write off the statistic itself altogether. In other words, it's not that the graph shows that Rice and Lemon were comparable. No, the graph shows that WAR as a statistic is moronic.

But here's the thing about WAR. It lines up with so much of what we understand to be true, even before we start in on any sort of advanced statistical analysis. Here's a list of the top-10 position players by B-Ref WAR:

1. Babe Ruth
2. Barry Bonds
3. Ty Cobb
4. Willie Mays
5. Hank Aaron
6. Tris Speaker
7. Stan Musial
8. Rogers Hornsby
9. Eddie Collins
10. Ted Williams

The next five on the list are Mickey Mantle, Lou Gehrig, Honus Wagner, Rickey Henderson and Mel Ott. We are talking baseball royalty. It's not as though Nomar Garciaparra or someone crept into the top of the list because of some quirk in the statistic. It actually aligns beautifully with a list your grandfather might furnish you of the very best baseball players of all time.

Here are the top pitchers:

1. Roger Clemens
2. Walter Johnson
3. Tom Seaver
4. Pete Alexander
5. Lefty Grove
6. Phil Niekro
7. Greg Maddux
8. Gaylord Perry
9. Warren Spahn
10. Randy Johnson

The next five? BERT BLYLEVEN, Christy Mathewson, Bob Gibson, Nolan Ryan and Steve Carlton. Nobody is saying that this is the definitive list of the best pitchers of all time, ranked perfectly in order. Peak matters, for instance, and I don't want to speak for anybody else but I don't think you'll find too many stat heads saying that Niekro, Perry or Blyleven were better than Pedro Martinez or Sandy Koufax. But the point remains the same: that's a pretty darn good list in terms of how it compares to common baseball wisdom of the very best pitchers ever.

There are single-season examples, too, of the visceral or instinctive aligning with analytical conclusions. Growing up, I heard non-stop stories from my father and grandfather of how great Carl Yastrzemski was for the 1967 Impossible Dream Boston Red Sox. We would listen regularly to the WHDH-produced soundtrack to that season, including the ragtime adaptation a song whose chorus went "Caaaahhhhrrrll Yastrzemski" over and over again. Later in life, my father in law, a Long Beach, California native who studied law in Boston during the 1967 season, would tell me one story after another about how incredible Yaz was. This is a man who is no Red Sox supporter, and as prone to hyperbole as anyone you could meet. Given everything I had heard throughout my life about Yaz in 1967, you'd have thought he had one of the very best seasons ever. Having bought in more and more to advanced statistical analysis, I just assumed all of this was overblown.

Well you know what? Yaz did have one of the very best seasons ever. Go on and check it out. Aside from three insane Barry Bonds seasons, Yaz's 1967 stands as the finest year by a position player since 1958. All of that wonderful stuff I had heard about Yaz, all of what seemed like folklore, it ALL lined up perfectly with what WAR would tell you about Yaz's heroics in 1967. It was one of the truly great single seasons in baseball history.

When I see a graph like the one above of Lemon and Rice, I don't immediately assume Lemon was better than Rice or even that Lemon was the same caliber of player Rice was. I'm more skeptical of defensive data than offensive, and I have a ton of respect for what Rice did at his peak. But that's not how WAR is supposed to work, or at least it's not how I think it should work. Instead, I believe it should be your first pass.

Oh, I see here that Blyleven ranks 11th all time and Morris 119th. I probably would be wrong to vote in Morris then, and not Blyleven.

Huh, look at this: Tim Raines ranks 55th all time and Lou Brock 121st. Maybe I need to think a little differently about Raines's candidacy?

In the Rice and Lemon case, it just shows that maybe we've thought a bit disproportionately about both players. Rice is in the Hall of Fame while Lemon, well I hadn't even thought about Chet Lemon in over a decade. That doesn't seem right to me anymore now that I have taken Dave Cameron's suggestion to run the comparison.

WAR is not perfect but it cannot be ignored, either. My hope is that more Hall of Fame voters will look to the stat to help frame their decisions. If a certain player amassed many of his Wins Above Replacement in exceedingly favorable conditions, no problem. Dock him. If WAR sells short a player like Morris or Rice for whatever reason, you can make that case too. All I ask is that voters recognize how well the statistic holds up to everything we understand to be true about baseball. More often than not for the attentive baseball fan or writer, a quick pass at WAR will serve more as affirmation than an eyebrow-raising contradiction. That being the case, when it does not quite align with pre-conceived beliefs, it merits further investigation and not immediate write-off.

 
 

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

NFL Week 17 Playoff Picture Coming Into Focus, At Least In AFC


FILE - In this Dec. 7, 2009 photo, New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees warms up before the NFL football game against the Washington Redskins in Landover, Md. (AP Photo/Nick Wass)

Nick Wass - AP

about 1 year ago: FILE - In this Dec. 7, 2009 photo, New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees warms up before the NFL football game against the Washington Redskins in Landover, Md. (AP Photo/Nick Wass)

View full size photo »

The NFL has seen 8 of 12 spots wrapped up for the playoffs. That means four more teams have work to do, not to mention playoff seeding that is on the line next week.

The Ravens won and are in. The Jets lost yet still got in.  The Eagles clinched a spot as well, and they don't play until Tuesday Night.  The ever-evolving NFL Playoff Picture looks a little clearer today but for those that need a refresher course, here is a look at all the playoff scenarios heading into the final week of the season:

AFC

CLINCHED: 

New England - AFC East and homefield advantage

Kansas City - AFC West

Baltimore - playoff spot

NY Jets - playoff spot

Pittsburgh - playoff spot

PITTSBURGH STEELERS

Pittsburgh clinches AFC North and a first-round bye with:

1)    PIT win OR

2)    PIT tie + BAL loss or tie OR

3)    BAL loss

BALTIMORE RAVENS

Baltimore clinches AFC North and a first-round bye with:

1)    BAL win + PIT loss or tie OR

2)    BAL tie + PIT loss

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS

Indianapolis clinches AFC South with:

1)    IND win or tie OR

2)    JAX loss or tie

JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS

Jacksonville clinches AFC South with:

1)    JAX win + IND loss

NFC

  CLINCHED: 

Chicago - NFC North

Philadelphia - NFC East

Atlanta - playoff spot

PHILADELPHIA EAGLES

Philadelphia has clinched the NFC East and still has a chance to earn a first-round bye and homefield advantage next week as of today.

CHICAGO BEARS

Chicago has clinched the NFC North and still has a chance to earn a first-round bye and homefield advantage next week as of today.

ATLANTA FALCONS

Atlanta clinches the NFC South and homefield advantage with a win or tie against New Orleans tonight.  If Atlanta loses tonight, it still has a chance to win the NFC South, a first-round bye and homefield advantage next week.

NEW ORLEANS SAINTS

New Orleans clinches a playoff spot with a win or tie against Atlanta tonight and still has a chance to win the NFC South, a first-round bye and homefield advantage next week. 

If New Orleans loses tonight, it can still clinch a playoff spot next week with: 

1)    NO win or tie OR

2)    NYG loss or tie + GB loss or tie

GREEN BAY PACKERS

Green Bay clinches a playoff spot with:

1)    GB win OR

2)    GB tie + NYG loss or tie + TB loss or tie OR

3)    NYG loss + TB loss

NEW YORK GIANTS

New York Giants clinch a playoff spot with:

1)    NYG win + GB loss or tie OR

2)    NYG win + NO loses twice OR

3)    NYG tie + GB loss + TB loss or tie

TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS

Tampa Bay clinches a playoff spot with:

1)    TB win + NO loss to ATL + NYG loss or tie OR

2)    TB win + NO loss to ATL + GB loss or tie OR

3)    TB win + NYG loss or tie + GB loss or tie OR

4)    TB tie + NYG loss + GB loss

ST. LOUIS RAMS

St. Louis clinches NFC West with:

1)    STL win or tie

SEATTLE SEAHAWKS

Seattle clinches NFC West with:

1)    SEA win

Ok, got all that?

 
 

Memories Of Another December 27th


FIreworks shoot from top of Cleveland Browns Stadium prior to the NFL game between the Baltimore Ravens and Cleveland Browns Monday, November 16, 2009 in Cleveland, Ohio. The Ravens won 16-0. (AP Photo/The Repository, Scott Heckel)

Scott Heckel - AP

about 1 year ago: FIreworks shoot from top of Cleveland Browns Stadium prior to the NFL game between the Baltimore Ravens and Cleveland Browns Monday, November 16, 2009 in Cleveland, Ohio. The Ravens won 16-0. (AP Photo/The Repository, Scott Heckel)

View full size photo »

A remembrance of a much-brighter December 27th

Has it really been 46 years ago today? As I sit here I look back on good decisions, and bad decisions, roads taken and roads by-passed. Friends I have known, and people I thought would always be there who have long since gone.

Forty-six years.

December 27, 1964 was a cold day. But I was ten, and when you are that young, cold only means invigorating air in your lungs, and the promise of snow and of course, as it is just after Christmas and well before New Year's, there are glorious winter days ahead filled with the things that make being young so wonderful, and -- sometimes -- so missed and longed-for when those days are gone forever.

Dad hated the snow, and that was hard for a ten-year old to figure out. Such a Scrooge I thought he was, hating the lovely flakes that fill the air and make sharp angles soft, and harsh streets glow at night. But he was a truck driver and so, he had his reasons for wishing for dry pavements.

On that December 27th, we were off to see a Browns' game at the old Stadium. Back then, success for the Browns was almost a ho-hum thing. In that long ago year, Cleveland had had the Browns for nineteen years, and in only one of those years had there been a losing record, There had been championships, and championship game losses, and close calls sprinkled through all the years, and there was no reason at all not to think that such would be the case -- why, maybe forever.

When I was ten, I had what I guess you could call an academic interest in the ramifications of a championship game. It meant we were playing to be the best, and that was something that meant a lot to me then, but obviously, not what it meant to life-long fans. Being the best was something the Browns had done a lot, and so had the AHL Barons, and the Indians were not far removed from a decade-plus of constant contention and a championship of their own. In other words, a championship here would be a continuation of what Cleveland fans of almost a half-century ago expected.

But this day was special because it was going to be the first Browns' game I was ever going to see live. All the weeks of listening to Gib Shanley on the radio, and there he was going to be, right in the same stadium. How cool was that going to be?

The opponents? Oh, that would be the Baltimore Colts, who actually had a better record than the Browns in that year, finishing 12-2 as opposed to Cleveland's 10-3-1. The Colts had Johnny Unitas. That was about all I knew of them, as I did not at that time have the love of all the ins-and-outs of football, of rosters and stats and schedules and playoff possibilities that I have now. So the Colts had Unitas, and that made them favored in this game. Guess that made him better than Frank Ryan, the Browns' QB. If the experts said Unitas was better and that the Colts were also better, then it must be so...yes?

I won't go into the details of that game. Frankly, after all these years, only a few memories linger with any clarity. It isn't because I don't remember "the exciting things", but that when the exciting things happened, the Big People were standing and screaming and little young me could not see over them, from my seat on the first-base dugout side of the Stadium, with the Bleachers seeming so far away to our right -- funny, thinking of them as the Bleachers. Back then, that's what they were. The Dawg Pound was still almost two decades in the future.

The Browns won 27-0, scoring all of their points in the second half, dazzling all with the win. Of course, I did not realize what an upset it had been -- the Colts came in almost two-touchdown favorites. And Frank Ryan was kinda better than John Unitas on that day. Yes, I would say that three touchdown passes -- all to Gary Collins -- made Ryan...why, kinda good. Even if he did wear the unlucky number 13.

Forty-six years. I am reconciled to that being the last championship I am ever likely to see. For me, that is okay. I did get to see it, and I am thinking that I will never forget it.

But I want somebody to win again, for all of you who came later, I want all of you to feel the euphoria that touched even a ten-year old who really did not understand the concept, or how special Winning It All really was.

I don't have a New Year's resolution, but I do have a New Year's wish. That is that every single one of you may someday experience the joy I felt -- and my parents and almost 80.000 other people also felt in that stadium, and countless others in the Cleveland area felt.

I want you all to know that, even if just once. So Go Browns, and Go Indians, and Go Cavaliers.

And Happy New Year everyone.

 
 

Bao Lin Shuhao Chinese delegation stage Nash Warriors say goodbye to the NBA


Although the Chinese guard Lin Shuhao part in the regular season this season has been the attractive return, but he could not trust his ability to deal with rotation on a firm. 

Recently, according to U.S. press "FanHouse" columnist Sam – Amitabh in his personal blog mini-passes, the Warriors plan to decentralize Lin Shuhao League NBDL,gucci handbags where Lin Shuhao subsidiary of Renault will be played with the Warriors the ball for a while. But today, the Warriors' game against the 76ers, Lin Shuhao still travel with the team battle. 

Lin Shuhao is temporarily placed in the NBDL 

Lin Shuhao 6 feet 3 inches tall and weighing 200 pounds. Despite not being able to participate successfully in the draft this year in the NBA, but by virtue of his outstanding performance in summer league, won a contract from the NBA. So far, Lin Shuhao played this season, the Warriors had a total of 17 regular season games, were present in 8.5 minutes of playing time, the production of 1.9 points, 0.8 rebounds, 0.9 assists, 1.1 steals per game report card . 

Although data is not glamorous, but brighter Lin Shuhao running some games, or for fans who left a deep impression on the number of the most famous warriors against the Lakers in the game, the face of Kobe and other major players, only 22 years old, first year rookie Lin Shuhao the situation is not stage fright. 

Despite the NBDL is about to be included in the Union, but that does not mean that the door to Lin Shuhao the NBA this off. After all, many active NBDL players have experienced after a genius in the league after a lot of players now have a place in their respective teams, some players even become indispensable players. 

Rockets guard Brooks has experienced highs and lows of this year, was sent to the NBDL league play, and ultimately their half of the 2008-09 season the opportunity to be truly superior, so for Lin Shuhao to the NBDL to develop their own confidence and is playing the offensive capability to be a good opportunity. Provided that the time has come, this is a "Nash Chinese," said the guard still have the opportunity to return to the NBA arena to show their skill.

 
 

2010 Team Reviews: JGR Inches Closer to Title



As easily the most staunch threat to unseat Jimmie Johnson and Co. from their record-setting run through the previous four seasons, Joe Gibbs Racing takes second spot in our review of the top teams in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series from 2010.

Denny Hamlin (above) delivered the last, best threat to Johnson's run to five consecutive championships at Homestead in November by holding a narrow points lead on the No. 48 before the season finale. However, a risky decision early in the race left Hamlin spinning and scrambling while Johnson cruised to his fifth.

It was a storyline we've seen before from the JGR camp -- most notably in Kyle Busch's 2008 Chase implosion.

Labeling the 2010 season a failure for JGR with one gaffe in one race, however, isn't fair to the otherwise notable successes the team saw during the campaign. Here's a look back, and the reasoning why, JGR was the second-best NASCAR organization in 2010.

2nd- Denny Hamlin [8 wins, 14 Top-5s, 18 Top-10s, 2 DNFs, 12.9 Avg Finish]

 

 
 

Jeremy Mayfield files notice of appeal in methamphetamines case


Suspended driver Jeremy Mayfield, as expected, will appeal a judge's decision that ruled in favor of NASCAR in his lawsuit over a May 1, 2009, drug test that he says was a false positive for methamphetamines. Mayfield filed the notice of appeal last Thursday in federal court and has 40 days to file the actual argument for his appeal. Depending on how quickly briefs are filed in the case, a hearing could come next May in Richmond, Va., but more than likely it will come no earlier than September.
 
 

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Winter Blues


Bronx 

Spirit Of Christmas Continues: Browns' Turnovers Gift Baltimore


Cleveland, OH (Sports Network) – Joe Flacco threw for 102 yards and a pair of touchdowns as the Baltimore Ravens clinched a playoff berth by defeating AFC North-rival Cleveland, 20-10.

Flacco completed 12-of-19 passes with an interception, while Derrick Mason and T.J. Houshmandzadeh both had a touchdown grab for Baltimore (11-4), which earned a postseason spot for the third straight season. The Ravens have won three straight and five of their last six overall.

Ray Rice finished with 92 yards rushing on 25 carries and Ed Reed had a pair of interceptions to lead the Baltimore defense.

Colt McCoy finished 15-of-29 passing for 149 yards with three picks for the Browns (5-10), who have dropped three in a row. Brian Robiskie accounted for Cleveland's only TD with a 29-yard grab early in the contest.

Cleveland used some trickery to open the scoring with 7:01 left in the first quarter. Backup quarterback Seneca Wallace took the snap and flipped it to wide receiver Mohamed Massaquoi, who rolled right and spotted Robiskie for the diving score. The play was challenged by Baltimore, but upheld.

Billy Cundiff capped a lengthy 16-play, 80-yard drive with a 27-yard field goal to get the Ravens on the board early in the second.

Massaquoi's fumble on Cleveland's ensuing possession led to another Baltimore score and a 10-7 lead.

Starting on the Browns' 20, two short runs by Rice moved the ball to the 15 before Flacco hit Houshmandzadeh with a strike in the middle of the end zone.

Cleveland picked up a pair of first downs on its next offensive try before Reed intercepted a McCoy pass at the Browns' 30 and returned it to midfield. The turnover led to Cundiff's 40-yarder with 4:06 to play before the half.

Phil Dawson's 30-yard field goal with three seconds left drew the Browns to within 13-10 at the break.

Cleveland went to its bag of tricks again with an onside kick attempt to start the second half, but the ball went out of bounds prior to going the necessary 10 yards and Baltimore took over at the Browns' 38.

After Flacco picked up a first down with a 13-yard scramble, the signal-caller hit Mason in the left corner of the end zone on the next play to put the visitors ahead 20-10 just 90 seconds into the third.

Baltimore maintained a 10-point edge heading into the fourth. After a lengthy time-consuming drive by the Ravens failed to result in points, Sam Koch's punt pinned the Browns back to their own six-yard line with 9:36 remaining.

Cleveland quickly moved down to the Baltimore 27 with an array of short passes by McCoy. However, the rookie quarterback missed his target on the next attempt and Reed picked it off in the end zone and brought it back to the 29 of the Ravens with under five minutes left.

Baltimore used a ball-control game behind Rice to run off all but a few seconds of the remaining time en rout to clinching its playoff berth.

Baltimore will host Cincinnati to close out the regular season next Sunday, while Cleveland hosts Pittsburgh…Baltimore has now won six straight against the Browns and improved to 17-7 in the all-time series…Reed now has 10 career interceptions against Cleveland, his most versus any opponent…Flacco improved to 6-0 against the Browns.

 
 

Followers